![]() |
| Photo @LA3ZA |
Showing posts with label iambic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label iambic. Show all posts
18 January, 2014
Single-lever and ultimatic adapter
02 June, 2013
The advantage of the single-lever paddle
![]() |
| My single-lever PCB keyer. |
K7QO, Chuck Adams, wrote "Using an Iambic Paddle" and compared the dual-lever paddle with the single-lever with respect to number of movements. If all 26 letters of the English alphabet and the numbers from 0 to 9 are sent, the single-lever paddle requires 73 strokes while a dual-lever and an iambic keyer requires 65. This is 11% less.
But when N1FN, Marshall G. Emm, wrote "Iambic Keying - Debunking the Myth" he analyzed the 7 letters that are faster to send with an iambic keyer - C, F, K, L, Y, Q, and R - and found that only one of them, the L, is among the 12 most frequent ones in English reducing the gain in efficiency to only 5%. He illustrated it this way:
Guess what't wrong with this figure? He didn't see the R and forgot that it is also among the most frequent letters.
03 May, 2013
Is the ultimatic Morse keyer really that efficient?
![]() |
| Vintage Ten-Tec Ultramatic Keyer KR50. Nice name but the similarity to ultimatic seems to be coincidental. |
The experience seems to be that it needs less timing precision than the iambic mode for letters like A, N, R, and K (· —, — ·, · — ·, — · —). When both paddles are squeezed, the last one to be pressed takes control. So when right-left is pressed one gets a dah followed by dits, not the dah-di-dah-dit of the iambic keyer.
It is very simple to add code for an ultimatic keyer to an iambic one. In recent years this has led to an ultimatic option in some stand-alone keyers, such as:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


